Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2023-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2023-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2023-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2023-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Addressed | 2019-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Addressed | 2019-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Addressed | 2019-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-09-01 → 1994-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-09-01 → 1994-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-09-01 → 1994-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1108 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2710 µg/L | 229/229 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 18.725 µg/L 125% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 71.1 µg/L | 186/223 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2164 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2340 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0012 mg/L 8% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 31/31 | LCR | 2025 |
| Chloroform | 0.8050 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 14/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.449 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.54 µg/L | 14/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 13/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 4.45 µg/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 11/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.45 µg/L | 9/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.975 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 205.25 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 212 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Selenium | 1.7 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 0.6700 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6800 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.6635 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6800 µg/L | 2/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Mercury | 0.0742 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0750 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 0.6635 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6800 µg/L | 2/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylene Dibromide | 0.1400 µg/L 280% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 0.0500 µg/L | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 61.7 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
31 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Stockton Water Department
Is Stockton Water Department tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Stockton Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Stockton Water Department's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Lead, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Stockton Water Department serve?
Stockton Water Department reports serving 650 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Stockton Water Department had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 125 violations on file for Stockton Water Department, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 16 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.