Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-10-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 616 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 993 µg/L | 185/185 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 8.036 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L | 155/156 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 2.34 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 153/178 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L | 151/156 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 35.925 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 46 µg/L | 140/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 11.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 137/156 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.46 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.88 µg/L | 121/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.022 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.47 µg/L | 104/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 8.67 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 101/156 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 96/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.987 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.34 µg/L | 54/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 23/23 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.5220 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6500 µg/L | 17/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 580 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1780 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1860 µg/L | 11/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 146.5 µg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 149 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Arsenic | 1.7 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Selenium | 7.88 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Mercury | 0.0409 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0410 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.1115 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.13 µg/L | 2/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.3100 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Cyanide | 4 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
55 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Woodbury City W Dept
Is Woodbury City W Dept tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Woodbury City W Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Woodbury City W Dept's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Woodbury City W Dept serve?
Woodbury City W Dept reports serving 10,263 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Woodbury City W Dept had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 321 violations on file for Woodbury City W Dept, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.