Tap WaterIndex

← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

Mantua Township Mua

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 82 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

82
contaminants tested
22
detected
12,600
people served
7
health-based violations
New Jersey rankingsLead in New JerseyPFAS in New Jersey
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Gloucester

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
117
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0055 µg/L 2/13 2024
PFOA 0.0048 µg/L 2/13 2024
Pfpea 0.0056 µg/L 2/13 2024
PFOS 0.0040 µg/L 1/13 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
16.14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.2 µg/L
133/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.3 µg/L
128/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
11.265 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L
128/134 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
38.825 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.4 µg/L
124/125 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
10.044 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34 µg/L
100/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
571 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 4577 µg/L
85/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
310 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L
42/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
8.96 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 24.6 µg/L
37/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
11.74 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.92 µg/L
22/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.336 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.02 µg/L
20/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 15/15 LCR 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
12/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.5775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.84 µg/L
8/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1195 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1270 µg/L
7/9 SYR4 2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.97 µg/L
5/129 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 4/7 SYR4 2016–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
118.5 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2012
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.3155 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.32 µg/L
2/129 SYR4 2012–2019
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PHEASANT, DUANE PAUL
Phone
856-468-1111

Frequently asked questions about Mantua Township Mua

Is Mantua Township Mua tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Mantua Township Mua's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mantua Township Mua's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mantua Township Mua serve?

Mantua Township Mua reports serving 12,600 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Mantua Township Mua had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 117 violations on file for Mantua Township Mua, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.