Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-03-11 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-11-11 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-11-11 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L | 19/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 0.2140 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3500 µg/L | 17/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 16/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.78 µg/L | 16/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| O-Dichlorobenzene | 0.2790 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 600 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3000 µg/L | 15/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chloroform | 1.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 14/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 8.185 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 12/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.3880 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4800 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| TTHM | 13.12 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.9 µg/L | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 5.97 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| P-Dichlorobenzene | 0.0500 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 75 µg/L | 3/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.1625 pCi/L 63% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.25 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Selenium | 1.548 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 0.3800 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 12.4 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chlorobenzene | 0.0400 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 0.5500 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Mercury | 0.0900 µg/L 4.5% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.2500 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 0.0600 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
26 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cedar Springs Mhp Well #
Is Cedar Springs Mhp Well # tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Cedar Springs Mhp Well #'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cedar Springs Mhp Well #'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, Trichloroethylene, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cedar Springs Mhp Well # serve?
Cedar Springs Mhp Well # reports serving 90 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Cedar Springs Mhp Well # had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 321 violations on file for Cedar Springs Mhp Well #, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 8 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.