← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

Cedar Springs Mhp Well #

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
24
detected
90
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Cape May

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
321
violations on file
8
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-03-11
MR Monitoring Archived 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28
MON Monitoring Archived 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-11-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-11-11
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dibromochloromethane
2.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L
19/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroethylene
0.2140 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3500 µg/L
17/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
16/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.78 µg/L
16/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
O-Dichlorobenzene
0.2790 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 600 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3000 µg/L
15/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
1.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
14/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
8.185 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
12/13 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.3880 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4800 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
13.12 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.9 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.48 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.97 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2012–2019
P-Dichlorobenzene
0.0500 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 75 µg/L
3/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.1625 pCi/L 63%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.25 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2015
Selenium
1.548 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
0.3800 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
12.4 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Chlorobenzene
0.0400 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
0.5500 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Mercury
0.0900 µg/L 4.5%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.2500 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
0.0600 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/21 SYR4 2012–2018
26 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideNitrateStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTrichloroacetic AcidVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-Dichloroethylenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
COUSE, CHRISTINA
Phone
609-465-7979

Frequently asked questions about Cedar Springs Mhp Well #

Is Cedar Springs Mhp Well # tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Cedar Springs Mhp Well #'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cedar Springs Mhp Well #'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, Trichloroethylene, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cedar Springs Mhp Well # serve?

Cedar Springs Mhp Well # reports serving 90 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Cedar Springs Mhp Well # had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 321 violations on file for Cedar Springs Mhp Well #, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 8 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.