Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-04-11 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2023-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2021-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-12-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0017 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Chloroform | 6.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.685 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L | 12/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 14.355 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.4 µg/L | 12/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.36 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L | 10/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 19.2 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.7915 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.03 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.362 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.39 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 1.52 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.7965 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.8500 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L | 6/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 2.86 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.8760 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8800 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 67.635 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 68 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Selenium | 1.27 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 0.3800 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Cyanide | 19 µg/L 9.5% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 0.3200 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Mercury | 0.1300 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 0.4900 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Grande Woods North Mhp
Is Grande Woods North Mhp tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Grande Woods North Mhp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Grande Woods North Mhp's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Copper, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Grande Woods North Mhp serve?
Grande Woods North Mhp reports serving 200 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Grande Woods North Mhp had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 22 violations on file for Grande Woods North Mhp, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.