Is New Lisbon Development Ctr Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: State government
Counties served: Burlington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

966

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2025-01-01 → 2025-06-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2025-01-01 → 2025-06-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2025-01-01 → 2025-06-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2025-01-01 → 2025-06-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2019-08-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2019-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	1074.5 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 5780 µg/L	152/200	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	98.89 µg/L 659% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L worst single sample: 267 µg/L	102/197	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0098 mg/L 65% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	43/43	LCR	2026
Chloroform	21.306 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 33.9 µg/L	37/42	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	16.17 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 23 µg/L	33/42	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	8.9995 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 28.51 µg/L	32/42	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	14.6455 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 25.47 µg/L	30/42	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	44.45 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 46.7 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Nitrate	1705 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	12/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	22.365 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 35.4 µg/L	12/14	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	13.565 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 19.1 µg/L	10/14	SYR4	2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	5.1 pCi/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid	5.46 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L	7/14	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	3.338 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.77 µg/L	7/14	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	8.435 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L	4/14	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	64.9 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 65 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Tetrachloroethylene	0.9850 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L worst single sample: 1 µg/L	3/29	SYR4	2012–2019
Cyanide	1 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Chromium	1 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Combined Uranium	1.043 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2012
Ethylene Dibromide	0.0163 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 0.0500 µg/L	1/30	SYR4	2012–2019
Fluoride	160 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L	1/4	SYR4	2012–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	15.3 pCi/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L	1/1	SYR4	2012
Mercury	0.3300 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid	1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/14	SYR4	2012–2019

45 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: CURRID, ERIN
Phone: 609-726-1000

Frequently asked questions about New Lisbon Development Ctr

Is New Lisbon Development Ctr tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in New Lisbon Development Ctr's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in New Lisbon Development Ctr's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does New Lisbon Development Ctr serve?

New Lisbon Development Ctr reports serving 2,014 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has New Lisbon Development Ctr had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 966 violations on file for New Lisbon Development Ctr, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.