← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

Evesham Mua

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 101 contaminants and detected 26. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

101
contaminants tested
26
detected
45,538
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Burlington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
158
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-01-01 → 1992-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2015-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-01-01 → 2013-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0038 µg/L 1/26 2025
Pfpea 0.0037 µg/L 1/26 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
23.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38 µg/L
153/154 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
8.199 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
142/154 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.812 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.71 µg/L
138/154 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
36.66 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L
138/138 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.96 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.3 µg/L
113/138 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.21 µg/L
111/138 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
284.8 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 361 µg/L
109/110 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
6.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
89/138 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
1.94 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 71.1 µg/L
75/86 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
450 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 460 µg/L
31/47 SYR4 2014–2018
Bromoform
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L
26/154 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
125 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 136 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2016–2018
Lead
0.0014 mg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2024
Nitrate
160 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/144 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
8.58 pCi/L 57%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 9.5 pCi/L
11/12 SYR4 2014–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.876 pCi/L 58%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3 pCi/L
9/12 SYR4 2014–2018
Selenium
7.525 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L
6/25 SYR4 2016–2018
Arsenic
2.38 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
5/25 SYR4 2016–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.028 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
3/138 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.108 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.12 µg/L
3/138 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
77.71 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 80 µg/L
3/28 SYR4 2013–2016
Nitrite
54.625 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.1 µg/L
2/46 SYR4 2013–2018
Cyanide
4 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/33 SYR4 2014–2018
Chromium
3.4 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/25 SYR4 2016–2018
75 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BOOTH, JEFFREY
Phone
856-983-1878

Frequently asked questions about Evesham Mua

Is Evesham Mua tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Evesham Mua's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Evesham Mua's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Evesham Mua serve?

Evesham Mua reports serving 45,538 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Evesham Mua had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 158 violations on file for Evesham Mua, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.