Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-02-01 → 2009-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-02-01 → 2009-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-02-01 → 2009-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-02-01 → 2009-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 21.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.5 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 56.66 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 75.4 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 11.478 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.4 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 17.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.1 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 88.96 µg/L 111% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 112.4 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 32.9 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 41 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 12.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.87 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.7335 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.19 µg/L | 120/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 109.17 µg/L 8.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 267.6 µg/L | 94/94 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 1.8075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.05 µg/L | 52/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 7.564 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.37 µg/L | 49/94 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.28 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.48 µg/L | 36/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.983 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 18/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00076 mg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2026 |
26 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Wallington Water Dept
Is Wallington Water Dept tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Wallington Water Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Wallington Water Dept's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Wallington Water Dept serve?
Wallington Water Dept reports serving 11,583 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Wallington Water Dept had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 75 violations on file for Wallington Water Dept, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 13 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.