Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 222.5 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 480 µg/L | 26/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00066 mg/L 4.4% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 16.255 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 40.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52.3 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.621 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.72 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 18.805 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 12.585 µg/L 84% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L | 10/26 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 63.195 µg/L 79% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 78 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 26.815 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 31 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.6955 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.8385 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L | 7/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Saddle River Water Utility
Is Saddle River Water Utility tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Saddle River Water Utility's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Saddle River Water Utility's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Saddle River Water Utility serve?
Saddle River Water Utility reports serving 600 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Saddle River Water Utility had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 21 violations on file for Saddle River Water Utility, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.