← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

Oakland Water Dept

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 83 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

83
contaminants tested
25
detected
12,754
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Bergen

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
179
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-06-01 → 2004-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1990-09-01 → 1991-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1990-09-01 → 1991-02-28
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-27
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-27
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-27
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-27
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-27
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-27

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0220 µg/L 6/7 2024
PFOS 0.0230 µg/L 6/7 2024
PFBS 0.0150 µg/L 5/7 2024
Pfhxa 0.0081 µg/L 4/7 2024
PFHXS 0.0040 µg/L 4/7 2024
Pfpea 0.0084 µg/L 4/7 2024
Pfhpa 0.0046 µg/L 3/7 2024
Pfba 0.0062 µg/L 2/7 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromoform
3.934 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.45 µg/L
144/164 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.219 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.04 µg/L
139/160 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.284 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.69 µg/L
137/157 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
10.105 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.17 µg/L
126/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
0.9475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.42 µg/L
110/155 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
239.4 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 920 µg/L
97/98 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
5700 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7300 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
11.32 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.7 µg/L
19/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0033 mg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2025
Barium
220.75 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
4.249 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.34 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.6025 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.63 µg/L
6/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.386 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.42 µg/L
5/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.61 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.71 µg/L
5/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
3755 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3800 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012
Arsenic
1.15 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.4500 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/128 SYR4 2012–2019
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
TIRSERIO, KEVIN
Phone
201-337-8104

Frequently asked questions about Oakland Water Dept

Is Oakland Water Dept tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Oakland Water Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Oakland Water Dept's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Oakland Water Dept serve?

Oakland Water Dept reports serving 12,754 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Oakland Water Dept had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 179 violations on file for Oakland Water Dept, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.