Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-07-01 → 2010-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-07-01 → 2010-10-01 |
2 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about W and E
Is W and E tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring found no contaminants above the detection limit for W and E. See the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for the full official status.
How many people does W and E serve?
W and E reports serving 528 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.
Has W and E had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 54 violations on file for W and E, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.