← Vermont

Tap water quality report

N Walpole Village District/Low

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 76 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

76
contaminants tested
18
detected
625
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cheshire

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
246
violations on file
4
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-08-01 → 1997-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-08-01 → 1997-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-08-01 → 1997-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-08-01 → 1997-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
1,1-Dichloroethylene
2.13 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 7 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
35/43 SYR4 2014–2019
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
2.44 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
27/43 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
256.85 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 333 µg/L
24/26 SYR4 2015–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
21/47 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
7.6 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
19/26 SYR4 2015–2019
Chloroform
6.076 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L
17/47 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroethylene
1.08 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
17/43 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
7/47 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
15.08 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.9 µg/L
3/17 SYR4 2016–2019
Arsenic
1.95 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2015–2019
Barium
3.95 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2015–2019
Chromium
6.9 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2015–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.2 pCi/L 24%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2016
Combined Uranium
1 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2014–2016
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2016–2019
Selenium
1 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2015–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.6 µg/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2016–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2016–2019
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, TotalO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PATRICK KINIRY

Frequently asked questions about N Walpole Village District/Low

Is N Walpole Village District/Low tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in N Walpole Village District/Low's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in N Walpole Village District/Low's water?

EPA monitoring detected 1,1-Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does N Walpole Village District/Low serve?

N Walpole Village District/Low reports serving 625 people in Vermont, per its EPA record.

Has N Walpole Village District/Low had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 246 violations on file for N Walpole Village District/Low, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.