Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Remick Acres

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
14
detected
60
people served
39
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Carroll

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

39
health-based violations
51
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-08-01 → 2010-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6200 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7100 µg/L
36/48 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
1535 µg/L 118%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1700 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
7.9204 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L
28/30 SYR4 2015–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.995 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Chloroform
10.105 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Dibromochloromethane
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/3 SYR4 2015–2018
TTHM
15.185 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.3 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Barium
11.9 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Chromium
1.3 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
Dichloroacetic Acid
7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.1 pCi/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
11.7 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2017
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PAUL STEWART

Frequently asked questions about Remick Acres

Is Remick Acres tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Remick Acres's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Remick Acres's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Remick Acres serve?

Remick Acres reports serving 60 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Remick Acres had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 51 violations on file for Remick Acres, of which 39 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.