Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-01-01 → 1996-06-06 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-01-01 → 1996-06-06 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-04-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-04-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1650 µg/L 127% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 4600 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lead | 3.7 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 7/30 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Chloroform | 20.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.9980 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.79 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| TTHM | 28.141 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.29 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.73 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Barium | 18.9 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 14.905 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.7000 pCi/L 14% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.7 pCi/L 11% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Lead | 0.0210 mg/L 140% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 1/1 | LCR | 1999 |
62 contaminants tested, none detected
Frequently asked questions about Eastfield Crossing
Is Eastfield Crossing tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Eastfield Crossing's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Eastfield Crossing's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Eastfield Crossing serve?
Eastfield Crossing reports serving 113 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.
Has Eastfield Crossing had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 65 violations on file for Eastfield Crossing, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.