← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Seabrook Water Dept

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
24
detected
14,000
people served
156
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Rockingham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

156
health-based violations
1,029
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0080 µg/L 2/8 2024
Pfhxa 0.0044 µg/L 1/8 2024
PFOS 0.0053 µg/L 1/8 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
768.554 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1530 µg/L
290/290 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
6.19093 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 52.5 µg/L
139/280 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
32.35 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L
34/51 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
33/51 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L
33/51 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
11.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 45 µg/L
32/51 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
2.51 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
30/51 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate
1449.5 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1490 µg/L
30/58 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
2.82 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
25/54 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.51 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
18/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
16/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Barium
28.955 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.9 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2014–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.73465 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.763 µg/L
10/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Chromium
3.2576 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.447 µg/L
5/10 SYR4 2014–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.2 pCi/L 64%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.6 pCi/L
5/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Uranium
3.08 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloromethane
1 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/31 SYR4 2014–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.6000 pCi/L 4%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/5 SYR4 2014–2016
Nitrite
340 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/10 SYR4 2015–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CURTIS SLAYTON

Frequently asked questions about Seabrook Water Dept

Is Seabrook Water Dept tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Seabrook Water Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Seabrook Water Dept's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Seabrook Water Dept serve?

Seabrook Water Dept reports serving 14,000 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Seabrook Water Dept had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 1029 violations on file for Seabrook Water Dept, of which 156 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.