Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Autumn Woods

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 74 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

74
contaminants tested
15
detected
193
people served
4
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Rockingham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2003-04-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2003-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2003-02-01 → 2003-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2003-02-01 → 2003-02-28

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
419.7 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 434 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.295 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
6.06 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.73 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
14 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
0.7800 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
1.3983 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Barium
15.1182 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.1928 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.165 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.51 µg/L 9.2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.345 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.6000 pCi/L 12%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
Combined Uranium
1.7 µg/L 5.7%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.2 pCi/L 8%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
Lead
1.38174 µg/L 9.2%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 1/12 SYR4 2014–2017
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LESLIE MORGAN

Frequently asked questions about Autumn Woods

Is Autumn Woods tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Autumn Woods's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Autumn Woods's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Autumn Woods serve?

Autumn Woods reports serving 193 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Autumn Woods had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Autumn Woods, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.