← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Pittsfield Aqueduct

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
12
detected
1,625
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Merrimack

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
371
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1992-01-01 → 1997-10-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2019-04-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2011-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2011-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2011-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2011-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
12.688 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
49/49 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 68 µg/L
49/49 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
49/49 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
78 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 82 µg/L
49/49 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
34 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L
45/47 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
45/47 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
44/47 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
126.55 µg/L 9.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 260 µg/L
22/28 SYR4 2014–2019
Barium
5.73939 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.78585 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
6.12 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
4/22 SYR4 2015–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.005 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
4/47 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0700 mg/L 467%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
1/1 LCR 1993
63 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CHRISTOPHER COUNTIE

Frequently asked questions about Pittsfield Aqueduct

Is Pittsfield Aqueduct tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Pittsfield Aqueduct's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pittsfield Aqueduct's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pittsfield Aqueduct serve?

Pittsfield Aqueduct reports serving 1,625 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Pittsfield Aqueduct had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 371 violations on file for Pittsfield Aqueduct, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.