Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Paradise Estates Condominium

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
12
detected
45
people served
12
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Hillsborough

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-02-01 → 2014-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-02-01 → 2014-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-02-01 → 2014-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-02-01 → 2014-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
174.3 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 372 µg/L
38/41 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate
2300 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 12/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
27 µg/L 180%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
6/41 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
4.07 pCi/L 81%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.4 pCi/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
6.06 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 6.1 pCi/L
3/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
1.95 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Barium
12.9 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2014–2018
Bromoform
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/6 SYR4 2014–2018
Chromium
5 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
0.0190 mg/L 127%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
 1/1 LCR 2014
Selenium
2 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
63 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
RICHARD BIBEAU

Frequently asked questions about Paradise Estates Condominium

Is Paradise Estates Condominium tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Paradise Estates Condominium's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Paradise Estates Condominium's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Paradise Estates Condominium serve?

Paradise Estates Condominium reports serving 45 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Paradise Estates Condominium had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Paradise Estates Condominium, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.