Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Whispering Winds

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 13 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

13
contaminants tested
10
detected
488
people served
0
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Rockingham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
7
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
84.735 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 93.7 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
7.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Bromoform
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Chloroform
14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.312 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Dibromochloromethane
4.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.865 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2017
TTHM
26 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.8 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.622 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2017
3 contaminants tested, none detected
LeadMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
LESLIE MORGAN

Frequently asked questions about Whispering Winds

Is Whispering Winds tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Whispering Winds's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Whispering Winds's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Whispering Winds serve?

Whispering Winds reports serving 488 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Whispering Winds had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 7 violations on file for Whispering Winds, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.