← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Ossipee Mountains Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 68 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

68
contaminants tested
6
detected
255
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Carroll

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
440
violations on file
42
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-11-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
390 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
482.9 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 540.1 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
390 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
16.27 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.5 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2019
Cadmium
1.1 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.5000 pCi/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DAVID SHEA

Frequently asked questions about Ossipee Mountains Estates

Is Ossipee Mountains Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Ossipee Mountains Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ossipee Mountains Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Cadmium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ossipee Mountains Estates serve?

Ossipee Mountains Estates reports serving 255 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Ossipee Mountains Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 440 violations on file for Ossipee Mountains Estates, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 42 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.