Is Farley Rd Estates Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Hillsborough

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	64.305 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 73.9 µg/L	20/20	SYR4	2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane	2.505 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2014–2019
Chloroform	2.21 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.335 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2014–2019
TTHM	7.25 µg/L 9.1% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2014–2019
Bromoform	0.9100 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1 µg/L	10/14	SYR4	2014–2019
Arsenic	18.804 µg/L 188% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L worst single sample: 19.2 µg/L	4/16	SYR4	2016–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	0.2900 pCi/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L worst single sample: 0.3000 pCi/L	2/2	SYR4	2014
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate	2.595 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L	2/9	SYR4	2014–2018
Fluoride	411.55 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 419 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2016–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	0.6750 pCi/L 4.5% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 0.7000 pCi/L	2/2	SYR4	2014
Toluene	0.7900 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L	2/10	SYR4	2014–2018
Lithium	11.3 µg/L No EPA limit set	2/2	UCMR-5	2024
Barium	118 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L	1/2	SYR4	2016–2019

91 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: LESLIE MORGAN

Frequently asked questions about Farley Rd Estates

Is Farley Rd Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Farley Rd Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Farley Rd Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Farley Rd Estates serve?

Farley Rd Estates reports serving 85 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Farley Rd Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Farley Rd Estates, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.