Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Ministerial/Parrish Hills

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 74 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

74
contaminants tested
16
detected
305
people served
10
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Rockingham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-09-01 → 2006-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-09-01 → 2006-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-09-01 → 2006-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-09-01 → 2006-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-09-01 → 2006-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
267.4 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 289 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2015–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
3.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.325 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
12 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
0.9600 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Uranium
1.385 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2015–2019
Barium
4.77366 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.77754 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Fluoride
1025 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1030 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
12.26 pCi/L 82%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 12.7 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
1.495 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2015–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.09 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Arsenic
1.1 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Chromium
1.9472 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LESLIE MORGAN

Frequently asked questions about Ministerial/Parrish Hills

Is Ministerial/Parrish Hills tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Ministerial/Parrish Hills's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ministerial/Parrish Hills's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ministerial/Parrish Hills serve?

Ministerial/Parrish Hills reports serving 305 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Ministerial/Parrish Hills had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Ministerial/Parrish Hills, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.