Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Village Dist of Eastman

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
13
detected
3,400
people served
22
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Sullivan

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

22
health-based violations
128
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
400 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 570 µg/L
21/22 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
4.5 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
19/22 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
0.0070 mg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 10/10 LCR 2024
Chloroform
47.71 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.7 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2016–2019
TTHM
62.52 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 63.6 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.2 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2016–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.3 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2017–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
49.6 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 50.8 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2017–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
28.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.5 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2017–2019
Fluoride
590 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Barium
24 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Combined Uranium
1.6 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
91 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
AMY LEWIS

Frequently asked questions about Village Dist of Eastman

Is Village Dist of Eastman tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Village Dist of Eastman's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Village Dist of Eastman's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Village Dist of Eastman serve?

Village Dist of Eastman reports serving 3,400 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Village Dist of Eastman had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 128 violations on file for Village Dist of Eastman, of which 22 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.