Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Breton Woods Dev

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 68 contaminants and detected 4. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

68
contaminants tested
4
detected
90
people served
19
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Belknap

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

19
health-based violations
41
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-12-16
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-12-16
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-12-16
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-12-16
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-12-16
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-12-01 → 1997-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
14.8 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
7/12 SYR4 2015–2019
Copper
98.4 µg/L 7.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 111 µg/L
4/12 SYR4 2015–2019
Barium
19.9 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Fluoride
307.5 µg/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 310 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ANDREA CURTIS

Frequently asked questions about Breton Woods Dev

Is Breton Woods Dev tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 4 contaminants in Breton Woods Dev's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Breton Woods Dev's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Barium, Fluoride. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Breton Woods Dev serve?

Breton Woods Dev reports serving 90 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Breton Woods Dev had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 41 violations on file for Breton Woods Dev, of which 19 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.