Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Chalet Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 69 contaminants and detected 4. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

69
contaminants tested
4
detected
35
people served
10
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Belknap

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
83
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-10-01 → 1991-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-10-01 → 1991-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-10-01 → 1991-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-10-01 → 1991-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-10-01 → 1991-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
118 µg/L 9.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 136 µg/L
6/12 SYR4 2015–2018
Fluoride
667 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 670 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
1.95 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/12 SYR4 2015–2018
Chromium
6 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
THOMAS ROUX

Frequently asked questions about Chalet Village

Is Chalet Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 4 contaminants in Chalet Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Chalet Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Chromium. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Chalet Village serve?

Chalet Village reports serving 35 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Chalet Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 83 violations on file for Chalet Village, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.