← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Exeter Water Dept

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 30. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
30
detected
12,236
people served
181
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Rockingham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

181
health-based violations
271
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0130 µg/L 2/6 2024
PFBS 0.0030 µg/L 2/6 2024
Pfhxa 0.0040 µg/L 2/6 2024
PFOA 0.0060 µg/L 2/6 2024
PFOS 0.0040 µg/L 2/6 2024
Pfpea 0.0040 µg/L 2/6 2024
Pfhpa 0.0030 µg/L 1/6 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
280 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2700 µg/L
252/257 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
29.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
100/101 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
121 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
100/101 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
100/101 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41 µg/L
84/84 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
161.475 µg/L 202%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 205.2 µg/L
84/84 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
64.7 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 98 µg/L
84/84 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
40 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57 µg/L
84/84 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
42.8 µg/L 285%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
53/248 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.855 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
30/84 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
10 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
26/32 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
26/26 LCR 2024
Barium
13 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.695 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
8/84 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.51 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.6 pCi/L
7/7 SYR4 2015–2016
Combined Uranium
0.4000 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2015–2016
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.88 pCi/L 19%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.3 pCi/L
5/7 SYR4 2015–2016
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
0.7780 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
5/22 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate
550 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/24 SYR4 2014–2019
Fluoride
166 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
3/84 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
0.7000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/101 SYR4 2014–2019
Xylenes, Total
0.5000 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/17 SYR4 2014–2019
77 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
STEPHEN DALTON

Frequently asked questions about Exeter Water Dept

Is Exeter Water Dept tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 30 contaminants in Exeter Water Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Exeter Water Dept's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Exeter Water Dept serve?

Exeter Water Dept reports serving 12,236 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Exeter Water Dept had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 271 violations on file for Exeter Water Dept, of which 181 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.