← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Logan East Rural Water

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
17
detected
3,000
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Burt

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
3
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
9040 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9140 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1195 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1290 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
3.923 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.36 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
0.0027 mg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2027
Bromoform
5.552 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.74 µg/L
10/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.757 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
10/17 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
13 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
10/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.078 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.19 µg/L
9/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.292 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.38 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.292 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.38 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
1.02 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.04 µg/L
5/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
3.2345 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.24 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
177.9 µg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 179 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
14.0245 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
379.35 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 384 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
17.7905 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.42 pCi/L 28%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
56 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BLAHAK, SHAWN C
Phone
402-685-5220
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Logan East Rural Water

Is Logan East Rural Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Logan East Rural Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Logan East Rural Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Logan East Rural Water serve?

Logan East Rural Water reports serving 3,000 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Logan East Rural Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 3 violations on file for Logan East Rural Water, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.