Tap WaterIndex

← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Scotts Bluff Co Sid 10 - Wildcat Hills

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 70 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

70
contaminants tested
12
detected
150
people served
16
health-based violations
Nebraska rankingsLead in NebraskaPFAS in Nebraska
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Scotts Bluff

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

16
health-based violations
40
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-11-01 → 2014-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
7407 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7640 µg/L
72/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
40.8036 µg/L 136%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 61.239 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2015
Copper
103 µg/L 7.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 106 µg/L
13/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
7.769 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.11 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
461.8 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 561 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
449.8 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 485 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00095 mg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 9/9 LCR 2024
Lead
4.6875 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.31 µg/L
6/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
2.8465 µg/L 5.7%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.85 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.12 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3310 pCi/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/4 SYR4 2015–2016
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
8.5 µg/L 142%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 6 µg/L
 1/12 SYR4 2013–2019
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CLOSSON, PATRICK H
Phone
308-672-4951
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Scotts Bluff Co Sid 10 - Wildcat Hills

Is Scotts Bluff Co Sid 10 - Wildcat Hills tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Scotts Bluff Co Sid 10 - Wildcat Hills's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Scotts Bluff Co Sid 10 - Wildcat Hills's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Combined Uranium, Copper, Arsenic, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Scotts Bluff Co Sid 10 - Wildcat Hills serve?

Scotts Bluff Co Sid 10 - Wildcat Hills reports serving 150 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Scotts Bluff Co Sid 10 - Wildcat Hills had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 40 violations on file for Scotts Bluff Co Sid 10 - Wildcat Hills, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.