← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Blair, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
24
detected
8,000
people served
60
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Washington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

60
health-based violations
112
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-02-01 → 2023-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0077 µg/L 1/4 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
1183 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1350 µg/L
99/99 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
20.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.1 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
176.6 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 448 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
51.135 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.5595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.52 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
75.5 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 102 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.31 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.5 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
36.2 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 55.9 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
12.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.1 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.127 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.23 µg/L
48/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.22 µg/L
21/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
2440 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.29 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.68 µg/L
14/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0016 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
Atrazine
0.5570 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6480 µg/L
5/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
67.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2023
Barium
28.82 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.6 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
2.075 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.13 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
3.7175 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.77 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Dinoseb
2.82 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 7 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.4000 µg/L 200%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 0.2000 µg/L
1/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.47 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.67 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/52 SYR4 2012–2019
80 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GREEN, PHIL
Phone
402-426-4191
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Blair, City of

Is Blair, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Blair, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Blair, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Bromodichloromethane, Copper, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Blair, City of serve?

Blair, City of reports serving 8,000 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Blair, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 112 violations on file for Blair, City of, of which 60 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.