← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Gering, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
23
detected
8,500
people served
126
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Scotts Bluff

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

126
health-based violations
126
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
1073 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1290 µg/L
98/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
678 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1240 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
4.547 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.44 µg/L
47/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7.2515 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.55 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.1 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
27.205 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.6 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
6.398 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L
39/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
2.949 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.05 µg/L
39/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
4.266 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
3070 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0027 mg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.9495 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.03 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.0105 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.14 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.493 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.0008 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.02 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
32.631 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.78 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.38 pCi/L 28%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.45 pCi/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
78.29 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 78.6 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
5.6 pCi/L 37%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.7 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Selenium
5.005 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.11 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Lithium
34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2023
Chromium
12.7 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HEATH, PATRICK T
Phone
308-436-5096
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Gering, City of

Is Gering, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Gering, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Gering, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Gering, City of serve?

Gering, City of reports serving 8,500 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Gering, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 126 violations on file for Gering, City of, of which 126 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.