← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Scottsbluff, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
23
detected
14,282
people served
39
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Scotts Bluff

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

39
health-based violations
39
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-08-01 → 2000-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-08-01 → 2000-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
9182 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11900 µg/L
314/314 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
591.65 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2100 µg/L
90/90 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
9.6525 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.1 µg/L
74/90 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
9.852 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.1 µg/L
49/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
15.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
49/63 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
34.18 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.5 µg/L
49/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
8.2705 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.77 µg/L
48/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.0475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.36 µg/L
46/46 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.72 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.94 µg/L
46/46 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
3.479 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
35/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
52.15 µg/L 174%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 52.448 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
7.27 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.74 µg/L
21/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.578 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.73 µg/L
20/46 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
81.65 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 82.7 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
541.75 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 544 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
46 µg/L
No EPA limit set
16/16 UCMR-5 2024
Chromium
11.195 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.3 µg/L
11/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.7 pCi/L 54%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.2 pCi/L
11/12 SYR4 2012–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
7.9 pCi/L 53%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 9.3 pCi/L
11/13 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
0.0032 mg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2024
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.1105 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.16 µg/L
10/46 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
5.89 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.92 µg/L
6/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
1.0381 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.06 µg/L
2/24 SYR4 2012–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SPENCER, KEVIN
Phone
308-630-6202
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Scottsbluff, City of

Is Scottsbluff, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Scottsbluff, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Scottsbluff, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Lead, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Scottsbluff, City of serve?

Scottsbluff, City of reports serving 14,282 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Scottsbluff, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 39 violations on file for Scottsbluff, City of, of which 39 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.