Tap WaterIndex

← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Wilber, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
18
detected
1,930
people served
15
health-based violations
Nebraska rankingsLead in NebraskaPFAS in Nebraska
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Saline

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
19
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01
MCL Health-based Archived 1993-02-01 → 1993-02-28
MCL Health-based Archived 1993-02-01 → 1993-02-28

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
10400 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10600 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1216.5 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1720 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
4.3425 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.14 µg/L
12/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0019 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 11/11 LCR 2023
Bromoform
2.87 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.14 µg/L
10/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.5725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.82 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.742 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.85 µg/L
10/18 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
9.4425 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
10/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.5725 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.82 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
6.868 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.06 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.15 µg/L
9/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
195.4 µg/L 9.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 199 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.1818 pCi/L 24%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.3 pCi/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
241.6 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 243 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
9.39 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.46 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
0.9217 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9500 µg/L
3/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
5.282 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.52 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Atrazine
0.1900 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
 1/10 SYR4 2012–2019
55 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
KRIVOLAVEK, TIM
Phone
402-821-3233
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Wilber, City of

Is Wilber, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Wilber, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wilber, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wilber, City of serve?

Wilber, City of reports serving 1,930 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Wilber, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 19 violations on file for Wilber, City of, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.