← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Auburn, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 103 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

103
contaminants tested
21
detected
3,478
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water under surface influence
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Nemaha

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
8
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0055 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
935.5 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 965 µg/L
99/99 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
809.25 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 921 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
7.318 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L
53/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
8.4785 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.59 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
5.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.15 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
4.2745 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.36 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.4 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
30.22 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.5 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.5365 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.56 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0023 mg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
2970 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.94 µg/L
13/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.135 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.16 µg/L
11/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
21.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2024
Arsenic
2.343 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.35 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
169.6 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
6.1276 µg/L 6.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
5.344 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.41 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/18 SYR4 2012–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LUHRING, RAY
Phone
402-274-4980
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Auburn, City of

Is Auburn, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Auburn, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Auburn, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Auburn, City of serve?

Auburn, City of reports serving 3,478 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Auburn, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Auburn, City of, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.