Tap WaterIndex

← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Waverly, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
19
detected
4,279
people served
31
health-based violations
Nebraska rankingsLead in NebraskaPFAS in Nebraska
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lancaster

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

31
health-based violations
31
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-12-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-12-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-12-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-12-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-11-01 → 2005-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-11-01 → 2005-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
8272.5 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8520 µg/L
104/104 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1309 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 45200 µg/L
103/103 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
906.4 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1070 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
55.28 µg/L 111%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 86.1 µg/L
25/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 15/15 LCR 2025
TTHM
13.08 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.8 µg/L
15/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.334 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.55 µg/L
13/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.992 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.65 µg/L
13/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.115 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.16 µg/L
11/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.465 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.77 µg/L
11/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
8.4425 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.1 µg/L
10/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
175.5 µg/L 8.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 177 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.126 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.36 µg/L
7/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
16.43 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.001 pCi/L 60%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.13 pCi/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
2.6245 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.71 µg/L
4/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
4.3655 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.48 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Uranium
35.611 µg/L 119%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
56 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FISHER, STEPHANIE
Phone
402-786-2312
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Waverly, City of

Is Waverly, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Waverly, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Waverly, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Fluoride, Copper, Selenium, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Waverly, City of serve?

Waverly, City of reports serving 4,279 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Waverly, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 31 violations on file for Waverly, City of, of which 31 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.