← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Benkelman, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
23
detected
850
people served
325
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Dundy

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

325
health-based violations
327
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Arsenic
8.8385 µg/L 88%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
34/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
331.65 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 433 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
59.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 68.3 µg/L
29/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
24.02 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.3 µg/L
29/31 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
84.76 µg/L 106%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.8 µg/L
29/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.789 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.1 µg/L
27/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
12.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L
26/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
15.175 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.6 µg/L
26/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
6030 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.764 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.36 µg/L
12/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.00052 mg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
9/9 LCR 2025
Chloroform
2.3525 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.37 µg/L
8/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.8665 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.87 µg/L
8/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
76.055 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 80.6 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
93.572 µg/L 312%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 99.83 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012
Fluoride
1449 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1470 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.6925 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.79 µg/L
4/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
8.471 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.82 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.436 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.47 µg/L
3/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
7.053 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.17 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.4900 pCi/L 9.8%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.5000 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.7445 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.83 µg/L
2/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
31 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2023
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
UNGER, JEREMIAH W
Phone
308-423-2540
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Benkelman, City of

Is Benkelman, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Benkelman, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Benkelman, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Benkelman, City of serve?

Benkelman, City of reports serving 850 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Benkelman, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 327 violations on file for Benkelman, City of, of which 325 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.