Tap WaterIndex

← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Waterloo, Village of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
18
detected
962
people served
0
health-based violations
Nebraska rankingsLead in NebraskaPFAS in Nebraska
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Douglas

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
26
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
15.345 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.6 µg/L
32/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
27.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.8 µg/L
32/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.147 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
10.325 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L
32/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.83 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.8 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
52.12 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.5 µg/L
32/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
24.115 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.8 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.5725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.26 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.94 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.12 µg/L
31/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
65 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 102 µg/L
26/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
6.102 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.18 µg/L
13/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0117 mg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 6/6 LCR 2021
Antimony, Total
1.6 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
2.37 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Barium
257 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Chromium
2.2 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Fluoride
340 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/32 SYR4 2012–2019
55 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SMITH, MELISSA
Phone
402-779-2292
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Waterloo, Village of

Is Waterloo, Village of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Waterloo, Village of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Waterloo, Village of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Waterloo, Village of serve?

Waterloo, Village of reports serving 962 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Waterloo, Village of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 26 violations on file for Waterloo, Village of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.