Is Uehling, Village of Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: GWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Dodge

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2007-06-01 → 2007-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2007-06-01 → 2007-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2007-06-01 → 2007-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2007-06-01 → 2007-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2003-07-01 → 2003-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2003-07-01 → 2003-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2003-07-01 → 2003-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2003-07-01 → 2003-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-09-01 → 2002-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-09-01 → 2002-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	1580 µg/L 122% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 1880 µg/L	21/21	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0065 mg/L 43% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	14/14	LCR	2027
Lead	5.331 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 5.89 µg/L	14/21	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	1.105 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.12 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromoform	3.468 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.2063 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.25 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.45 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.48 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	6.383 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 6.45 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	1.2063 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 1.25 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019

5 contaminants tested, none detected

ChloroformDichloroacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidTrichloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: WEITZENKAMP, BRENDA
Phone: 402-567-2234
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Uehling, Village of

Is Uehling, Village of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Uehling, Village of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Uehling, Village of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Uehling, Village of serve?

Uehling, Village of reports serving 241 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Uehling, Village of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 24 violations on file for Uehling, Village of, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.