Tap WaterIndex

← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

West Point, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 103 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

103
contaminants tested
20
detected
3,550
people served
15
health-based violations
Nebraska rankingsLead in NebraskaPFAS in Nebraska
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cuming

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
19
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-06-01 → 1998-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
2750 µg/L 212%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 4080 µg/L
117/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1030 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1060 µg/L
97/97 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
11.925 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 78.4 µg/L
96/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
25.355 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.6 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
27.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.5 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
19.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0034 mg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 22/22 LCR 2026
TTHM
66.39 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.8 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.504 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.15 µg/L
20/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
10.954 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L
13/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
8.444 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.83 µg/L
13/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.557 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.59 µg/L
12/14 SYR4 2012–2019
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
2.181 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.39 µg/L
12/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
266 µg/L 2.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 8/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.8670 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9210 µg/L
4/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.9145 pCi/L 78%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.11 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Lithium
30.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/2 UCMR-5 2023
Arsenic
1.88 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Barium
493 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
Chromium
6.46 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GOULETTE, THOMAS F
Phone
402-372-2466
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about West Point, City of

Is West Point, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in West Point, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in West Point, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does West Point, City of serve?

West Point, City of reports serving 3,550 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has West Point, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 19 violations on file for West Point, City of, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.