Tap WaterIndex

← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Wisner, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 76 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

76
contaminants tested
19
detected
1,239
people served
172
health-based violations
Nebraska rankingsLead in NebraskaPFAS in Nebraska
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cuming

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

172
health-based violations
176
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Selenium
57.4 µg/L 115%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 60.7 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2015–2019
Copper
449.45 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 838 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
7420 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 20/20 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
59.315 µg/L 395%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 192 µg/L
18/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Uranium
20.1523 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.605 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0111 mg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 13/13 LCR 2025
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
10.8 pCi/L 72%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 7/14 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.06 pCi/L 61%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.3 pCi/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
108.02 µg/L 5.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 112 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Chromium
9.642 µg/L 9.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Fluoride
311.3 µg/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 312 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Arsenic
2.7855 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.86 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2017
Bromodichloromethane
2.078 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.16 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.2245 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.34 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.7115 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
10.489 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
0.5220 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.63 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2014
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.63 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2014
57 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WOLDT, RANDY
Phone
402-841-9937
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Wisner, City of

Is Wisner, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Wisner, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wisner, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Selenium, Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wisner, City of serve?

Wisner, City of reports serving 1,239 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Wisner, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 176 violations on file for Wisner, City of, of which 172 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.