Tap WaterIndex

← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Imperial, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 98 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

98
contaminants tested
10
detected
2,071
people served
12
health-based violations
Nebraska rankingsLead in NebraskaPFAS in Nebraska
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Chase

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
17
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-12-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-12-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-12-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-12-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-11-01 → 2005-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-11-01 → 2005-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-11-01 → 2005-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-11-01 → 2005-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-10-01 → 1998-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-10-01 → 1998-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
3460.5 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3670 µg/L
78/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
138.6 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 142 µg/L
29/32 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
9.236 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.32 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Lithium
28.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 10/10 UCMR-5 2025
Lead
0.00082 mg/L 5.4%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 9/9 LCR 2025
Lead
3.538 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.73 µg/L
9/32 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
155.4 µg/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 161 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2015
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.2 pCi/L 44%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 5/8 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
893.2 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 906 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2015
Lasso
0.8095 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8450 µg/L
2/13 SYR4 2012–2018
88 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DAVISON, STEVEN (PAT)
Phone
308-882-4368
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Imperial, City of

Is Imperial, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Imperial, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Imperial, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Arsenic, Lithium, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Imperial, City of serve?

Imperial, City of reports serving 2,071 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Imperial, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for Imperial, City of, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.