← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Murray, Village of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
480
people served
9
health-based violations
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cass

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

9
health-based violations
9
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1992-05-01 → 1992-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-08-01 → 1991-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-08-01 → 1991-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-08-01 → 1991-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
611.8 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 896 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.00050 mg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
9/9 LCR 2024
Lead
4.746 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
8/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
4.9175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.01 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromoform
3.0055 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.04 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Chloroform
2.064 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.907 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.97 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
TTHM
14.615 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.41 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidTrichloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
HAYES, SHELLI S
Phone
402-235-2119
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Murray, Village of

Is Murray, Village of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Murray, Village of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Murray, Village of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Murray, Village of serve?

Murray, Village of reports serving 480 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Murray, Village of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Murray, Village of, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.