Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-02-01 → 2019-02-28 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-02-01 → 2019-02-28 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-02-01 → 2019-02-28 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 397.65 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 6.436 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.74 µg/L | 29/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 7.6225 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 83.8 µg/L | 24/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 19.525 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.1 µg/L | 14/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 13/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 8.376 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.54 µg/L | 13/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2026 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.63 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.86 µg/L | 11/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.2885 µg/L 7.1% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L | 8/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.086 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.11 µg/L | 7/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.605 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.78 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.012 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.49 µg/L | 5/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.8492 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8510 µg/L | 5/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 64.6 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 5.02 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Fluoride | 259 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
57 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about David City, City of
Is David City, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in David City, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in David City, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Arsenic, Lead, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does David City, City of serve?
David City, City of reports serving 3,000 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.
Has David City, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 3 violations on file for David City, City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.