← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Alliance, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
24
detected
8,070
people served
102
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Box Butte

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

102
health-based violations
102
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-10-01 → 2012-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-10-01 → 2012-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-10-01 → 2012-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-10-01 → 2012-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Arsenic
10.34 µg/L 103%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.6 µg/L
107/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
5430 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5720 µg/L
92/92 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
169.9 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 257 µg/L
58/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
7.34 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 135 µg/L
36/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
29.651 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 36.058 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
27.92 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L
19/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
10.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L
19/37 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
54.17 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.5 µg/L
19/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
11.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
15/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.441 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.87 µg/L
14/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
13.25 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.1 µg/L
14/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
46.25 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 46.4 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
911.5 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 924 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
5.3285 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.36 µg/L
10/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2025
Lithium
50 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/10 UCMR-5 2023
Chloroform
29.47 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.1 µg/L
7/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
6.93 pCi/L 46%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 7.2 pCi/L
7/19 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
10.178 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.4 µg/L
5/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
5.4995 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.54 µg/L
4/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.0845 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.17 µg/L
4/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.6 pCi/L 32%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.28 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/16 SYR4 2013–2019
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BROWN, SHANA
Phone
308-762-5400
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Alliance, City of

Is Alliance, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Alliance, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Alliance, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Lead, Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Alliance, City of serve?

Alliance, City of reports serving 8,070 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Alliance, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 102 violations on file for Alliance, City of, of which 102 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.