Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Walsh Rural Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
3,000
people served
0
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Walsh

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 20/20 LCR 2023
Copper
23.2 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
11/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
9.807 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.93 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
3.353 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.38 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
12.131 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.68 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.813 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.93 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.734 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.83 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.332 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.38 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
33.347 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.5 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.839 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.92 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
4.4245 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.81 µg/L
4/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/7 SYR4 2014–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
REILLY, BRIAN
Phone
701-352-3915
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Walsh Rural Water District

Is Walsh Rural Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Walsh Rural Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Walsh Rural Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Walsh Rural Water District serve?

Walsh Rural Water District reports serving 3,000 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Walsh Rural Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Walsh Rural Water District.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.