Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-09-05 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-10-02 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 397.5 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 530 µg/L | 68/70 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 16.25 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.2 µg/L | 31/70 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0152 mg/L 101% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 25/25 | LCR | 2024 |
| Chloroform | 22.8955 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.41 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.444 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 36.992 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.79 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 20.684 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 22.7 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.434 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.51 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.8485 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.87 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 12.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.5 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.47 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.93 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
2 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cando City of
Is Cando City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Cando City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cando City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cando City of serve?
Cando City of reports serving 1,115 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.
Has Cando City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 18 violations on file for Cando City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.