Is Stutsman Rural Water District Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Stutsman

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	1063 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 1400 µg/L	55/60	SYR4	2012–2017
Lead	2.985 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 3.17 µg/L	26/60	SYR4	2012–2017
Lead	0.0022 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	21/21	LCR	2023
Dibromoacetic Acid	2.2375 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.36 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	5.778 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 6.94 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	1.083 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.14 µg/L	7/8	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	3.371 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 3.56 µg/L	7/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	0.8350 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.8800 µg/L	6/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	0.8425 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L	6/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	0.7820 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.8200 µg/L	5/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	1.3025 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.31 µg/L	4/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	40 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	4/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Lithium	99.5 µg/L No EPA limit set	2/2	UCMR-5	2023
Arsenic	2.03 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2016
Barium	19.7 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	1.36 pCi/L 27% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L	1/1	SYR4	2017
Combined Uranium	1.54 µg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2017
Fluoride	724 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2018
Monobromoacetic Acid	3.82 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/8	SYR4	2012–2019

76 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: HEWSON, JESSE
Phone: 701-252-7727

Frequently asked questions about Stutsman Rural Water District

Is Stutsman Rural Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Stutsman Rural Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Stutsman Rural Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Dibromoacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Stutsman Rural Water District serve?

Stutsman Rural Water District reports serving 5,550 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Stutsman Rural Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Stutsman Rural Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.