← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Woodworth City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
50
people served
11
health-based violations
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Stutsman

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

11
health-based violations
86
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
24.1655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.7 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
90.839 µg/L 114%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 98.52 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
19.78 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.49 µg/L
21/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
28.89 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.01 µg/L
21/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
30.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.32 µg/L
21/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.22 µg/L
21/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
15.48 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.2 µg/L
21/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.676 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.22 µg/L
18/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2024
Copper
113.6 µg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 125 µg/L
13/30 SYR4 2013–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.382 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.39 µg/L
9/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
13.035 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.7 µg/L
8/30 SYR4 2013–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.2655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.27 µg/L
4/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/22 SYR4 2012–2019

Utility contact

Contact
FOSTER, LISA
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Woodworth City of

Is Woodworth City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Woodworth City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Woodworth City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Woodworth City of serve?

Woodworth City of reports serving 50 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Woodworth City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 86 violations on file for Woodworth City of, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.