Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Sharon City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
96
people served
0
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Steele

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
19
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MON Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-07-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-07-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-07-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-12-01 → 2010-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-12-01 → 2010-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2025
Copper
817.8 µg/L 63%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 857 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.9345 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.03 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
1.0995 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.12 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
5.431 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.55 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.363 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.38 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromochloromethane
5.9205 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.01 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.557 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.58 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
1.508 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.53 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
18.3855 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.71 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.2425 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.25 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.7365 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.75 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
2 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
ZENTZ, LIZY
Phone
701-524-2238
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Sharon City of

Is Sharon City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Sharon City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sharon City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sharon City of serve?

Sharon City of reports serving 96 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Sharon City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 19 violations on file for Sharon City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.