← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Southwest Water Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 96 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

96
contaminants tested
18
detected
8,537
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Stark

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
2
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Archived 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
111.8 µg/L 8.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 186 µg/L
117/120 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.982 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.43 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
10.192 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 75.97 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
12.154 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.62 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.6 µg/L
56/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
24.3125 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.65 µg/L
56/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.555 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.2 µg/L
27/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.4375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.85 µg/L
16/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
120 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.7725 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.83 µg/L
6/120 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
52.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2025
Barium
12.6 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Bromate
3 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/15 SYR4 2018–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
920 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.3590 pCi/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Pentachlorophenol
0.0400 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 1 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2017
78 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MURRAY, JEN
Phone
701-225-0241
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Southwest Water Authority

Is Southwest Water Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Southwest Water Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Southwest Water Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Southwest Water Authority serve?

Southwest Water Authority reports serving 8,537 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Southwest Water Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2 violations on file for Southwest Water Authority, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.