Is Rutland City of Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: GWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Sargent

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2015-09-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Lead	0.0019 mg/L 12% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	16/16	LCR	2025
Copper	971.6 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 1050 µg/L	15/15	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	2.325 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L	6/15	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	4.167 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.19 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Chloroform	15.3865 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 15.46 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Dibromochloromethane	0.9375 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.9500 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid	8.493 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 8.64 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
TTHM	20.491 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 20.6 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	16.847 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 17.13 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid	8.354 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 8.49 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017

4 contaminants tested, none detected

BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: BANISH, DEBORAH
Phone: 701-724-3081
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rutland City of

Is Rutland City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Rutland City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rutland City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rutland City of serve?

Rutland City of reports serving 163 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Rutland City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 57 violations on file for Rutland City of, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.